<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coda: One-window web development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifeclever.com/coda-one-window-web-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifeclever.com/coda-one-window-web-development/</link>
	<description>How to live and work as a designer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:51:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: illovich</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeclever.com/coda-one-window-web-development/comment-page-1/#comment-31809</link>
		<dc:creator>illovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 15:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeclever.com/coda-one-window-web-development/#comment-31809</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;To be a little more clear - but admitting that I may have missed some features - I don&#039;t see the value of an application of this type being constrained to &quot;one window&quot; if there isn&#039;t a lot of flexibility to how that window is configured. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When I work in Dreamweaver, I can work in code/design or split view, and the document window is surrounded by palletes that contextually provide ways for me to modify what I&#039;m working on.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Although Coda allows you to split the window horizontally, there seems to be other way to have your CSS palette available while you work on your design, but the CSS editor seems meant to be displayed in the whole window, so allowing vertical splits (my preference) would also require at least the CSS editor to be redone a bit, it seems. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, other things are an improvement to DW - I think the ability to switch between text and GUI css editing is nice in the CSS editor, for example.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be a little more clear &#8211; but admitting that I may have missed some features &#8211; I don&#8217;t see the value of an application of this type being constrained to &#8220;one window&#8221; if there isn&#8217;t a lot of flexibility to how that window is configured. </p>

<p>When I work in Dreamweaver, I can work in code/design or split view, and the document window is surrounded by palletes that contextually provide ways for me to modify what I&#8217;m working on.  </p>

<p>Although Coda allows you to split the window horizontally, there seems to be other way to have your CSS palette available while you work on your design, but the CSS editor seems meant to be displayed in the whole window, so allowing vertical splits (my preference) would also require at least the CSS editor to be redone a bit, it seems. </p>

<p>However, other things are an improvement to DW &#8211; I think the ability to switch between text and GUI css editing is nice in the CSS editor, for example.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: illovich</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeclever.com/coda-one-window-web-development/comment-page-1/#comment-31806</link>
		<dc:creator>illovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 15:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeclever.com/coda-one-window-web-development/#comment-31806</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I didn&#039;t get the sense that TextMate and Coda were similar products at all - isn&#039;t that like saying &quot;Dreamweaver CS3 is nice, but it&#039;s no BBEdit? For now I&#039;m sticking with BBEdit and Fetch!&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There are some things that GUI apps are just nicer for. I can get precise alignment on a  page layout by handcoding the postscript myself, but InDesign is much quicker.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, I will say that while I appreciate the effort, I find a lot of the interface to be non-standard and confusing (perhaps users of other panic products wouldn&#039;t have this problem).  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For the price (US$79) though, it&#039;s pretty nice, although I don&#039;t know that it&#039;s the Dreamweaver killer some others have said it is.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t get the sense that TextMate and Coda were similar products at all &#8211; isn&#8217;t that like saying &#8220;Dreamweaver CS3 is nice, but it&#8217;s no BBEdit? For now I&#8217;m sticking with BBEdit and Fetch!&#8221;</p>

<p>There are some things that GUI apps are just nicer for. I can get precise alignment on a  page layout by handcoding the postscript myself, but InDesign is much quicker.  </p>

<p>However, I will say that while I appreciate the effort, I find a lot of the interface to be non-standard and confusing (perhaps users of other panic products wouldn&#8217;t have this problem).  </p>

<p>For the price (US$79) though, it&#8217;s pretty nice, although I don&#8217;t know that it&#8217;s the Dreamweaver killer some others have said it is.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Henshaw</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeclever.com/coda-one-window-web-development/comment-page-1/#comment-30815</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Henshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 03:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeclever.com/coda-one-window-web-development/#comment-30815</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Coda is a beautiful, super slick app, but it&#039;s still no TextMate! For now I&#039;m sticking with TextMate and Transmit.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coda is a beautiful, super slick app, but it&#8217;s still no TextMate! For now I&#8217;m sticking with TextMate and Transmit.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

