<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Archive the Web with Diigo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifeclever.com/archive-the-web-with-diigo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifeclever.com/archive-the-web-with-diigo/</link>
	<description>How to live and work as a designer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:51:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeclever.com/archive-the-web-with-diigo/comment-page-1/#comment-84899</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 05:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeclever.com/archive-the-web-with-diigo/#comment-84899</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If http://netrocket.com had the cache feature they would be the perfect solution. Their scheduling, to view and interface are really cool. Diigo is very cool too. I actually use it with netrocket.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If <a href="http://netrocket.com" rel="nofollow">http://netrocket.com</a> had the cache feature they would be the perfect solution. Their scheduling, to view and interface are really cool. Diigo is very cool too. I actually use it with netrocket.com</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeclever.com/archive-the-web-with-diigo/comment-page-1/#comment-79846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeclever.com/archive-the-web-with-diigo/#comment-79846</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ma.gnolia saves copies: http://ma.gnolia.com/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ma.gnolia saves copies: <a href="http://ma.gnolia.com/" rel="nofollow">http://ma.gnolia.com/</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeclever.com/archive-the-web-with-diigo/comment-page-1/#comment-79801</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 06:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeclever.com/archive-the-web-with-diigo/#comment-79801</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Have you tried Simpy?  It&#039; FAST, among other things.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here is something to chew on:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://blog.simpy.com/blojsom/blog/2007/03/25/Ahead-of-Google-del-icio-us-etc.html
http://blog.simpy.com/blojsom/blog/2008/01/18/10-Reasons-for-Simpy-vs-del-icio-us.html&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried Simpy?  It&#8217; FAST, among other things.</p>

<p>Here is something to chew on:</p>

<p><a href="http://blog.simpy.com/blojsom/blog/2007/03/25/Ahead-of-Google-del-icio-us-etc.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.simpy.com/blojsom/blog/2007/03/25/Ahead-of-Google-del-icio-us-etc.html</a>
<a href="http://blog.simpy.com/blojsom/blog/2008/01/18/10-Reasons-for-Simpy-vs-del-icio-us.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.simpy.com/blojsom/blog/2008/01/18/10-Reasons-for-Simpy-vs-del-icio-us.html</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeclever.com/archive-the-web-with-diigo/comment-page-1/#comment-79667</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeclever.com/archive-the-web-with-diigo/#comment-79667</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly what Neil said.  Deli brings my browser (also FF) to its knees when it loads the first 100 of my bookmarks.  Unbelievable, can&#039;t it just be static HTML? Oh well, whatever.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll give Diigo a try.  It can&#039;t cripple my computer worse than del.icio.us.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly what Neil said.  Deli brings my browser (also FF) to its knees when it loads the first 100 of my bookmarks.  Unbelievable, can&#8217;t it just be static HTML? Oh well, whatever.</p>

<p>I&#8217;ll give Diigo a try.  It can&#8217;t cripple my computer worse than del.icio.us.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeclever.com/archive-the-web-with-diigo/comment-page-1/#comment-79658</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeclever.com/archive-the-web-with-diigo/#comment-79658</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If it&#039;s faster than delicious, that&#039;s a huge selling point  for me. Delicious has improved the saving process of late, but it&#039;s still horrendously slow when it comes to going back and searching through your links. It almost feels like it&#039;s going to break Firefox (curse the flaming &#039;beach ball of death!).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I gave Diigo a quick spin, and I must say I still prefer the existing delicious interface (it feels ALOT tighter and more clean-cut). A new version of delicious launches soon, so I think a Diigo vs New Delicious would make a good post!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s faster than delicious, that&#8217;s a huge selling point  for me. Delicious has improved the saving process of late, but it&#8217;s still horrendously slow when it comes to going back and searching through your links. It almost feels like it&#8217;s going to break Firefox (curse the flaming &#8216;beach ball of death!).</p>

<p>I gave Diigo a quick spin, and I must say I still prefer the existing delicious interface (it feels ALOT tighter and more clean-cut). A new version of delicious launches soon, so I think a Diigo vs New Delicious would make a good post!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

