<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A One Bucket System: The Ultimate Productivity Heresy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifeclever.com/a-one-bucket-system-the-ultimate-productivity-heresy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lifeclever.com/a-one-bucket-system-the-ultimate-productivity-heresy/</link>
	<description>How to live and work as a designer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:51:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet B</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeclever.com/a-one-bucket-system-the-ultimate-productivity-heresy/comment-page-1/#comment-306722</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeclever.com/a-one-bucket-system-the-ultimate-productivity-heresy/#comment-306722</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi there. It looks like some of your organizational and filing needs could be solved with the use of some clever software! There are a lot of options for filing software. We do document management and filing for a living with clever twist. The Paper Tiger Filing System is a proven tool and we are ready to help you in any way we can to meet your filing needs!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there. It looks like some of your organizational and filing needs could be solved with the use of some clever software! There are a lot of options for filing software. We do document management and filing for a living with clever twist. The Paper Tiger Filing System is a proven tool and we are ready to help you in any way we can to meet your filing needs!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeclever.com/a-one-bucket-system-the-ultimate-productivity-heresy/comment-page-1/#comment-202648</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeclever.com/a-one-bucket-system-the-ultimate-productivity-heresy/#comment-202648</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t have many contexts and keep them flexible based on what&#039;s happening in my life. At the moment I&#039;m on leave for a while and mostly hanging around home, so I have @home, @out (errands), @waiting for, and @work for the things to do when I get back. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@home gets pretty long but there&#039;s no practical difference between, say, making a phone call or doing the dusting, so they don&#039;t need to be in different lists. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I then mark high priority and short tasks for easy spotting.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have many contexts and keep them flexible based on what&#8217;s happening in my life. At the moment I&#8217;m on leave for a while and mostly hanging around home, so I have @home, @out (errands), @waiting for, and @work for the things to do when I get back. </p>

<p>@home gets pretty long but there&#8217;s no practical difference between, say, making a phone call or doing the dusting, so they don&#8217;t need to be in different lists. </p>

<p>I then mark high priority and short tasks for easy spotting.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeclever.com/a-one-bucket-system-the-ultimate-productivity-heresy/comment-page-1/#comment-199290</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeclever.com/a-one-bucket-system-the-ultimate-productivity-heresy/#comment-199290</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No offense, but your system wasn&#039;t as &quot;faithful&quot; to GTD guidelines as you may have thought.  Looking at the contexts that you mention (@waiting @weekend  @agenda @vacation @errand), most are not contexts at all, but =buckets=.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s why you had to scan and &quot;slowly work through&quot; you contexts &quot;... evaluating each and every task&quot; every time you &quot;finished even the smallest milestone&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You&#039;re right, that is crazy.  In GTD, the whole idea of contexts are to make tasks =pre-filtered= so that you do not have to think on the fly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If one bucket works for you, go for it.  But it would seem to only compound the amount you need to scan after each milestone.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No offense, but your system wasn&#8217;t as &#8220;faithful&#8221; to GTD guidelines as you may have thought.  Looking at the contexts that you mention (@waiting @weekend  @agenda @vacation @errand), most are not contexts at all, but =buckets=.</p>

<p>That&#8217;s why you had to scan and &#8220;slowly work through&#8221; you contexts &#8220;&#8230; evaluating each and every task&#8221; every time you &#8220;finished even the smallest milestone&#8221;.</p>

<p>You&#8217;re right, that is crazy.  In GTD, the whole idea of contexts are to make tasks =pre-filtered= so that you do not have to think on the fly.</p>

<p>If one bucket works for you, go for it.  But it would seem to only compound the amount you need to scan after each milestone.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benster1961</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeclever.com/a-one-bucket-system-the-ultimate-productivity-heresy/comment-page-1/#comment-194561</link>
		<dc:creator>benster1961</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 03:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeclever.com/a-one-bucket-system-the-ultimate-productivity-heresy/#comment-194561</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I loved all the comments.  I still don&#039;t have a perfect system but I&#039;m strongly considering checking out Neil Fiore&#039;s books.   I need to get beyond my procrastination.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Any comments on his materials?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved all the comments.  I still don&#8217;t have a perfect system but I&#8217;m strongly considering checking out Neil Fiore&#8217;s books.   I need to get beyond my procrastination.  </p>

<p>Any comments on his materials?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K man</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeclever.com/a-one-bucket-system-the-ultimate-productivity-heresy/comment-page-1/#comment-142078</link>
		<dc:creator>K man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeclever.com/a-one-bucket-system-the-ultimate-productivity-heresy/#comment-142078</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like a lot of people suffer from analysis-paralysis.  Whatever happened to the simple to-do list on a scrap of paper tucked into your wallet.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a lot of people suffer from analysis-paralysis.  Whatever happened to the simple to-do list on a scrap of paper tucked into your wallet.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeclever.com/a-one-bucket-system-the-ultimate-productivity-heresy/comment-page-1/#comment-108443</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 15:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeclever.com/a-one-bucket-system-the-ultimate-productivity-heresy/#comment-108443</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;For implementing GTD you might try out this web-based application:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Gtdagenda.com&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You can use it to manage your goals, projects and tasks, set next actions and contexts, use checklists, schedules and a calendar.
A mobile version is available too.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As with the last update, now Gtdagenda has full Someday/Maybe functionality, you can easily move your tasks and projects between &quot;Active&quot;, &quot;Someday/Maybe&quot; and &quot;Archive&quot;. This will clear your mind, and will boost your productivity.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hope you like it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For implementing GTD you might try out this web-based application:</p>

<p>Gtdagenda.com</p>

<p>You can use it to manage your goals, projects and tasks, set next actions and contexts, use checklists, schedules and a calendar.
A mobile version is available too.</p>

<p>As with the last update, now Gtdagenda has full Someday/Maybe functionality, you can easily move your tasks and projects between &#8220;Active&#8221;, &#8220;Someday/Maybe&#8221; and &#8220;Archive&#8221;. This will clear your mind, and will boost your productivity.</p>

<p>Hope you like it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carissa Thorp</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeclever.com/a-one-bucket-system-the-ultimate-productivity-heresy/comment-page-1/#comment-76800</link>
		<dc:creator>Carissa Thorp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeclever.com/a-one-bucket-system-the-ultimate-productivity-heresy/#comment-76800</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Having one list with no context isn&#039;t GTD heresy (see Chapter 2 p41 in the Australian edition). Allen says 20/30 up to 50 tasks is probably the limit for a single &quot;Next Actions&quot; list, but that&#039;s a suggestion, not a rule.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Contexts are just one of the ways to &quot;batch&quot; tasks. In GTD, if you don&#039;t use context, you move sideways to &quot;Time Available&quot;, &quot;Energy Available&quot;, &amp;/or &quot;Priority&quot;. I also batch in other ways.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Personally, I use contexts, but only because I limit myself to 4, the number I can fit onto a 2 page spread in my notebook; so I essentially have one list, but divided up visually on the page/s. Contexts just didn&#039;t work for me when I had to flip between separate pages. I think it was the lack of an in-one-glance overview of all current tasks that was the problem, rather than contexts themselves.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I will say, I probably don&#039;t have as many tasks as most people, so my solution might not work for everyone. And each context I chose is a sort of combination of &quot;the four criteria&quot;, and not just a purely location and tool delimited category.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;regards&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having one list with no context isn&#8217;t GTD heresy (see Chapter 2 p41 in the Australian edition). Allen says 20/30 up to 50 tasks is probably the limit for a single &#8220;Next Actions&#8221; list, but that&#8217;s a suggestion, not a rule.</p>

<p>Contexts are just one of the ways to &#8220;batch&#8221; tasks. In GTD, if you don&#8217;t use context, you move sideways to &#8220;Time Available&#8221;, &#8220;Energy Available&#8221;, &amp;/or &#8220;Priority&#8221;. I also batch in other ways.</p>

<p>Personally, I use contexts, but only because I limit myself to 4, the number I can fit onto a 2 page spread in my notebook; so I essentially have one list, but divided up visually on the page/s. Contexts just didn&#8217;t work for me when I had to flip between separate pages. I think it was the lack of an in-one-glance overview of all current tasks that was the problem, rather than contexts themselves.</p>

<p>I will say, I probably don&#8217;t have as many tasks as most people, so my solution might not work for everyone. And each context I chose is a sort of combination of &#8220;the four criteria&#8221;, and not just a purely location and tool delimited category.</p>

<p>regards</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bod</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeclever.com/a-one-bucket-system-the-ultimate-productivity-heresy/comment-page-1/#comment-73843</link>
		<dc:creator>Bod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeclever.com/a-one-bucket-system-the-ultimate-productivity-heresy/#comment-73843</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As a recent adopter I too have been struggling with contexts.  After a few short weeks my lists seem to have settled on @work, @home,@waiting and someday maybe. I can&#039;t get past that I still need to set some sort of priority and then create the appropriate context.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a recent adopter I too have been struggling with contexts.  After a few short weeks my lists seem to have settled on @work, @home,@waiting and someday maybe. I can&#8217;t get past that I still need to set some sort of priority and then create the appropriate context.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeDidIt</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeclever.com/a-one-bucket-system-the-ultimate-productivity-heresy/comment-page-1/#comment-73154</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeDidIt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeclever.com/a-one-bucket-system-the-ultimate-productivity-heresy/#comment-73154</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My system is close to yours but a single bucket is not enough for me. Nevertheless, I definitely don&#039;t use contexts the way the GTD crowd advocates. I was wasting a lot of time with contexts like @Phone, @Web, etc. Now I use @Home and @Work. This allows me to quickly hide my Work stuff when I&#039;m home, etc., and vice versa. I have a lot of tasks in both worlds so I like being able to hide the noise, so to speak. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I use Priority to slot items for this week, someday, reference, etc.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I use Toodledo.com as it is very helpful. Vitalist.com works well, too.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Have a great one!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My system is close to yours but a single bucket is not enough for me. Nevertheless, I definitely don&#8217;t use contexts the way the GTD crowd advocates. I was wasting a lot of time with contexts like @Phone, @Web, etc. Now I use @Home and @Work. This allows me to quickly hide my Work stuff when I&#8217;m home, etc., and vice versa. I have a lot of tasks in both worlds so I like being able to hide the noise, so to speak. </p>

<p>I use Priority to slot items for this week, someday, reference, etc.</p>

<p>I use Toodledo.com as it is very helpful. Vitalist.com works well, too.</p>

<p>Have a great one!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.lifeclever.com/a-one-bucket-system-the-ultimate-productivity-heresy/comment-page-1/#comment-73143</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeclever.com/a-one-bucket-system-the-ultimate-productivity-heresy/#comment-73143</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Add me to the list of those that never, ever was able to get into the Contexts framework. I spent the first 3 months after reading GTD in 2003, setting up my system, and I felt the same unease you describe, David. The unease came off in two distinct chunks: the first was getting rid of the 43 folders (31 day, 12 months). But the second, biggest aha of the whole system–”and it remains the biggest today even 5 years later–” was dumping contexts. I woke one morning, going, &quot;wait... I have only one context... my life!&quot; Hard to describe now what an insight that was, but it was huge, and I felt the weight lift off my brain. I dumped all the categories, and set up everything to flow into one Inbox, always. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I certainly get that a no-context method wouldn&#039;t work for everyone. But if you&#039;re feeling stressed about applying the excitement you got from reading GTD, try deleting the contexts idea. Personally, I&#039;ve always loved tossing orthodoxy, and molding David Allen&#039;s system has been no different. Make it work for you, I&#039;m pretty sure that&#039;s the object.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add me to the list of those that never, ever was able to get into the Contexts framework. I spent the first 3 months after reading GTD in 2003, setting up my system, and I felt the same unease you describe, David. The unease came off in two distinct chunks: the first was getting rid of the 43 folders (31 day, 12 months). But the second, biggest aha of the whole system–”and it remains the biggest today even 5 years later–” was dumping contexts. I woke one morning, going, &#8220;wait&#8230; I have only one context&#8230; my life!&#8221; Hard to describe now what an insight that was, but it was huge, and I felt the weight lift off my brain. I dumped all the categories, and set up everything to flow into one Inbox, always. </p>

<p>I certainly get that a no-context method wouldn&#8217;t work for everyone. But if you&#8217;re feeling stressed about applying the excitement you got from reading GTD, try deleting the contexts idea. Personally, I&#8217;ve always loved tossing orthodoxy, and molding David Allen&#8217;s system has been no different. Make it work for you, I&#8217;m pretty sure that&#8217;s the object.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

